COVID-19 chest X-ray image analysis by threshold-based segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
COVID-19 is a severe acute respiratory syndrome that has caused a major ongoing pandemic worldwide. Imaging systems such as conventional chest X-ray (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) were proven essential for patients due to the lack of information about the complications that could result from this disease. In this study, the aim was to develop and evaluate a method for automatic diagnosis of COVID-19 using binary segmentation of chest X-ray images. The study used frontal chest X-ray images of 27 infected and 19 uninfected individuals from Kaggle COVID-19 Radiography Database, and applied binary segmentation and quartering in MATLAB to analyze the images. The binary images of the lung were split into four quarters; Q1 = right upper quarter, Q2 = left upper quarter, Q3 = right lower, and Q4 = left lower. The results showed that COVID-19 patients had a higher percentage of attenuation in the lower lobes of the lungs (p-value < 0.00001) compared to healthy individuals, which is likely due to ground-glass opacities and consolidations caused by the infection. The ratios of white pixels in the four quarters of the X-ray images were calculated, and it was found that the left lower quarter had the highest number of white pixels but without a statistical significance compared to right lower quarter (p-value = 0.102792). This supports the theory that COVID-19 primarily affects the lower and lateral fields of the lungs, and suggests that the virus is accumulated mostly in the lower left quarter of the lungs. Overall, this study contributes to the understanding of the impact of COVID-19 on the respiratory system and can help in the development of accurate diagnostic methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".