MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323660818 · doi:10.1148/ryct.220247

Myocardial Inflammation at FDG PET/MRI and Clinical Outcomes in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Participants after COVID-19 Vaccination

2023· article· en· W4323660818 on OpenAlexafffund
Constantin Marschner, Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan, Dakota Gustafson, Kathryn L. Howe, Jason E. Fish, Robert M. Iwanochko, Rachel M. Wald, Husam Abdel‐Qadir, Slava Epelman, Angela M. Cheung, Rachel Hong, Kate Hanneman

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiology Cardiothoracic Imaging · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemToronto General HospitalWomen's College HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersAssociation Canadienne des Radiologistes
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticMyocarditisInternal medicineVaccinationCardiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose To evaluate potential cardiac sequelae of COVID-19 vaccination at 2-month follow-up and to relate cardiac symptoms to myocardial tissue changes at fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/MRI, blood biomarkers, health-related quality of life, and adverse outcomes. Materials and Methods In this prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04967807), a convenience sample of individuals aged 17 years or older were enrolled after COVID-19 vaccination and were categorized as symptomatic myocarditis (new cardiac symptoms within 14 days of vaccination and met diagnostic criteria for acute myocarditis); symptomatic, no myocarditis (new cardiac symptoms but did not meet criteria for myocarditis); and asymptomatic (no new cardiac symptoms). Standardized evaluation was performed 2 months after vaccination, including cardiac fluorine 18–FDG PET/MRI, assessment of blood biomarkers, and health-related quality of life. Statistical analysis included Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact tests. Results Fifty-four participants were evaluated a median of 72 days (IQR, 42–91 days) after COVID-19 vaccination: 17 symptomatic with myocarditis (mean age, 36 years ± 15 [SD]; 13 men), 17 symptomatic without myocarditis (mean age, 42 years ± 12; seven men), and 20 asymptomatic (mean age, 45 years ± 14; nine men). No participants in the symptomatic without myocarditis or asymptomatic groups had focal FDG uptake, myocardial edema, or impaired ventricular function. Two participants with symptomatic myocarditis had focal FDG uptake, and three had high T2 mapping values on MR images. Health-related quality of life was lower in the symptomatic myocarditis group than in the asymptomatic group. There were no adverse cardiac events beyond myocarditis in any participant. Conclusion At 2-month follow-up, FDG PET/MRI showed evidence of myocardial inflammation in two of 17 participants diagnosed with acute myocarditis early after COVID-19 vaccination, but not in symptomatic and asymptomatic participants without acute myocarditis. Keywords: Molecular Imaging, MR Imaging, Heart, Inflammation ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04967807 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiology Cardiothoracic ImagingSame topicLymphadenopathy Diagnosis and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207