Ragusa, Olga. Andrea Ragusa—Editore libraio-italiano a New York dal 1931 al 1974. Introduzione di Paolo Bragoli
Bibliographic record
Abstract
York, in una concisa ed esauriente pubblicazione delinea l'attività paterna nel campo editoriale, ricoprente uno spazio di tempo di otto lustri.L'opera, uscita nella collana diretta da Cosimo Ceccuti per la Biblioteca della Nuova Antologia, offre preziose informazioni su un periodo critico per la cultura italiana nel suo affermarsi negli Stati Uniti negli anni trenta e quaranta.I cenni biografici su Andrea Ragusa, precedenti la sua venuta a New York, servono a mettere in luce le sue qualifiche nell'editoria tramite i legami di lavoro allacciati, fra altri, con Calogero Tumminelli ed Emilio Treves, fondatori delle case editrici omonime.Già edotto nella diffusione del libro italiano all'estero, Andrea Ragusa si lanciò nell'impresa nord-americana sostenuto da una raccomandazione di Giovanni Gentile, indirizzata a Giuseppe Prezzolini, da
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.026 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".