MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323669673 · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107172

Efficacy of once-daily, single-inhaler, fixed-dose combination of mometasone/indacaterol/glycopyrronium in patients with asthma with or without persistent airflow limitation: Post hoc analysis from the IRIDIUM study

2023· article· en· W4323669673 on OpenAlexaff
Richard N. van Zyl-Smit, Huib A.M. Kerstjens, Jorge Máspero, Κonstantinos Κostikas, Motoi Hosoe, Ana-Maria Tanase, Peter D’Andrea, Karen Mezzi, Dominic E. A. Brittain, David Lawrence, Kenneth R. Chapman

Bibliographic record

VenueRespiratory Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNovartis Animal HealthNovartis
KeywordsIndacaterolMedicineAsthmaPost-hoc analysisSalmeterolCorticosteroidBronchodilatorFluticasone propionateFluticasoneInternal medicineFixed-dose combinationCOPDInhalerAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background A novel, once-daily, fixed-dose combination of mometasone furoate/indacaterol acetate/glycopyrronium bromide (MF/IND/GLY) delivered via Breezhaler® is the first inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting ꞵ 2 -agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (ICS/LABA/LAMA) therapy approved for the maintenance treatment of asthma in adults inadequately controlled on ICS/LABA combination. In patients with asthma and persistent airflow limitation (PAL), maximal treatment, especially with combination is suggested. This post hoc analysis of data from the IRIDIUM study assessed the efficacy of MF/IND/GLY in asthma patients with and without PAL. Methods Patients with post-bronchodilator FEV 1 ≤80% of predicted and FEV 1 /FVC ratio of ≤0.7 were categorised as PAL subgroup and the remaining as the non-PAL subgroup. Lung function parameters (FEV 1 , PEF, and FEF 25%–75% ) and annualised asthma exacerbations rates were evaluated in both subgroups across the treatment arms: once-daily high-dose MF/IND/GLY (160/150/50 μg), high-dose MF/IND (320/150 μg) and twice-daily high-dose fluticasone/salmeterol (FLU/SAL; 500/50 μg). Results Of the 3092 randomised patients, 64% (n = 1981) met the criteria for PAL. Overall, there was no evidence of treatment difference between PAL and non-PAL subgroups (interaction P -value for FEV 1 , FEF 25%–75% , PEF, moderate or severe exacerbations, severe exacerbations and all exacerbations were 0.42, 0.08, 0.43 0.29, 0.35 and 0.12, respectively). In the PAL subgroup, high-dose MF/IND/GLY versus high-dose MF/IND and high-dose FLU/SAL improved trough FEV 1 (mean difference: 102 mL [ P < 0.0001] and 137 mL [ P < 0.0001]) and reduced moderate or severe (16% and 32%), severe (25% and 39%) and all exacerbations (19% and 38%), respectively. Conclusions Once-daily fixed-dose MF/IND/GLY was efficacious in asthma patients with and without persistent airflow limitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.007
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRespiratory MedicineSame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207