MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4323763784 · doi:10.1017/9781846155505.010

Reform

2007· other· en· W4323763784 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsContext (archaeology)ConstitutionLiberalismEmancipationEconomic historyPolitical sciencePeriod (music)LawHistoryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The period after 1815 is the least studied period in the history of Britain's relationship with Hanover. Historians seem to have assumed that knowledge of the impending end of union, issuing from different laws respecting female succession, reduced the relevance of dynastic union. But this eventuality could appear remote, and observers usually focused upon dynastic union's contemporary influence. This was most often detected in liberalism, the expansion of the right to participate in formal politics or the economy. George IV's extension of civil and political rights to Hanoverian Catholics in 1824 made it harder for him to resist similar measures in Britain; Hanoverian Catholics apparently benefited from the same double standard established for Quebec in 1774. Both precedents were of great interest to the activists who managed to procure equality for Catholic laymen in 1829. Just as Hanoverian developments influenced Catholic emancipation in Britain, Britain's reform act of 1832 influenced Hanover's constitution of the following year; both enfranchised middle-class men. Finally, Britain and Hanover reduced the legacy of coerced labor in 1833. Britain provided for the eventual abolition of slavery in its Caribbean colonies by a combination of compensation and apprenticeship, while Hanover abolished the last remnants of such commutation – seigneurial dues. Finally, Hanoverian reform occurred in the context of rule by the duke of Cambridge – especiallyafter his promotion to viceroy in 1831. The formal supercession of collegial by viceregal rule brought Hanover closer to British colonial forms. All of these developments informed imperial interpretations of the dynastic union during its latter days. Yet liberalism was not limited to the British empire; indeed, it was spreading throughout the Atlantic world. Although the British reform act of 1832 attempted to avoid the means of France's 1830 revolution, it had similar ends. Liberalism would have advanced in Hanover and Britain, even had they not been joined in dynastic union. In conferring civil and political equality upon Hanoverian Catholics, George IV was simply bringing Hanoverian law into conformity with the constitution of the German confederation as established at the Congress of Vienna.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0910.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics→French-language works237,207→