MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323784829 · doi:10.1063/5.0137234

Study of the dependence of an air jet shape on pressure in a Laval nozzle

2023· article· en· W4323784829 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Iurii Prikhodko, A N Shishkov, K V Osintsev, Yaroslav Bolkov, Alexey Postyka, Danil Valmuhametov, Victoria Petropavlovskaya

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Technology and Methodologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNozzleJet (fluid)MechanicsDisplacement (psychology)Supersonic speedRange (aeronautics)PhysicsFlow (mathematics)Materials scienceThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article considers the dependences of the pressure and velocity ratios typical for the Laval nozzle. The dependence of the shape and speed of the air jet on the pressure change of the ejecting jet is determined. The regularity of displacement of pressure extremes and reduction of their density along the length of the nozzle is shown. The change in the frequency of pulsations of the jet with an increase in the velocity of the gas flow is described. CFD modeling and its control parameters are considered. Approximate analytical solutions, simple in form, were obtained. They made it possible to carry out studies of the pressure state in the range of the longitudinal coordinate along the length of the nozzle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicEngineering Technology and MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207