Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traveling between diverse dimensions, in his book, The Cousin, John Calabro offers startling images, disquieting insights into Freudian-like psyches, sexually distinctive experiences, and culturally nostalgic and realistic sentiments of a Sicily of the present and of the past.The story, in which every component (words, settings, characters, themes, narrator) fulfills an indispensable and never unnecessary function, opens with a husband and a wife, Salvatore and Susan, traveling throughout Sicily.The English reader immediately relates to Susan's ingenuousness of Italy and her longing to embrace this foreign and largely mysterious Sicilian culture: "This trip had been Susan's idea more than mine, a beach holiday in Sicily where she could also discover a bit more about me, and I was already regretting it" (7).The reader immediately relates to Salvatore's closed emotions and his ultimate candour: "Unlike me, who, according to Susan, for a Sicilian, showed very little emotion.In her opinion, I could stand to be a bit more expressive, even more demonstrative, and maybe shouldn't try to hide my feelings all the time" ( 23).John Calabro, by means of the characters of Susan and Salvatore, outlines the two most essential struggles that plague humans at various stages in life: the external and internal struggles.Throughout the novel, Susan's discovery of a new world is constantly interwoven with the attempts of Charlie (Salvatore's cousin) to find a new self.In the narrative, there is also a constant reminder of the story of the Italian immigrants in the pursuit of a new home in Canada (resembling Susan's external struggle in Sicily) as well as the memories and internal struggles of a past life in Sicily before leaving: "He says that my mother and father were very different but I am not sure that they were all that different.In Canada, they acted the same way, dispassionate and superficial [...].It was a mistake coming back; I didn't want to re-open those wounds" (40).Thus,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.084 | 0.029 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".