MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323791823 · doi:10.46687/jsar.v5i1.107

ELEMENTARY PARTICLES, ATOMIC NUCLEI AND MOLECULES ACCORDING TO THE BSM – SUPERGRAVITATION UNIFIED THEORY

2014· article· en· W4323791823 on OpenAlexaff
S. Sargoytchev

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Scientific and Applied Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Applications
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPauli exclusion principlePhysicsAtomic nucleusUnified field theoryCoulombToroidAtomic physicsNuclear structureTheoretical physicsNuclear physicsQuantum mechanicsElectronPlasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Basic Structures of Matter – Supergravitation Unified Theory (BSM-SG) is based on alternative concept of the physical vacuum. At small distance below 1 angstrom the Supergravitational forces appear as strong nuclear forces, while at larger distance they converge to the Newtonian gravity. Amongst the major outcomes from BSM-SG theory are derived material structures of the stable elementary particles forming the material structure of atomic nuclei. The protons and neutrons are not spherical but having a shape of twisted and folded torus, respectively. They are thin but with much larger size than the size of the atomic nuclei according to the QM models, so the Coulomb field is not converged to a size in the order of 10E-15 m but is distributed over much larger size of the proton. The BSM-SG models of nuclear structures exhibit an excellent match to the pattern of Periodic Table, showing signatures of valences, Pauli Exclusion Principle and Hunds rule. They also define the angular restrictions of the chemical bonds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Scientific and Applied ResearchSame topicQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207