MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323823152 · doi:10.1117/12.2655529

Electroabsorption characteristics of semi-insulating indium phosphide as applied to optoelectronic modulation

2023· article· en· W4323823152 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander C. MacGillivray, Nikolai I. Lesack, Ilija R. Hristovski, Matthias F. Jenne, Sayra Gorgani, Benjamin Maglio, Jonathan F. Holzman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBand gapSemiconductorOptoelectronicsIndium phosphideElectric fieldPhotonMaterials sciencePhoton energyDirect and indirect band gapsModulation (music)PhysicsCondensed matter physicsOpticsGallium arsenide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we explore the band edge absorption characteristics of semiconductors as applied to optoelectronic modulation—with careful consideration to the departures from ideality in the semiconductors. To this end, we develop a rigorous model of electroabsorption in semiconductors that characterizes the electric-field-induced constriction/narrowing of the bandgap and the resulting increase in absorption of photons, whose energies are slightly below the bandgap energy. The model unifies the Franz-Keldysh effect, characterizing the electric-field-induced tunneling of photoexcited electrons from valence band states to conduction band states, and the Einstein model, quantifying the encroachment of valence and conduction band states into the bandgap. Careful consideration is given here to the nonidealities in the semiconductor, which arise within the valence band as degenerate states, due to light and heavy holes, and within the bandgap, as encroaching Urbach tail states. We apply the model in characterizing optoelectronic modulation of 980-nm photons with semi-insulating indium phosphide (SI-InP), and we see strong agreement between our theoretical and experimental results over a wide range of electric fields and photon energies. Ultimately, the findings show that optoelectronic modulation can be had with large modulation depths over short propagation lengths through the semiconductor. This opens the door to highly effective implementations of optoelectronic modulators in emerging free-space optical communication systems—given that such modulators do not allow for prolonged (guided-wave) propagation and have thus exhibited small modulation depths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207