Flaviviruses alter endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria contacts to regulate respiration and apoptosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT With no therapeutics available, there is an urgent need to better understand the pathogenesis of flaviviruses which constitute a threat to public health worldwide. During infection, dengue virus (DENV) and Zika virus (ZIKV), two flaviviruses induce alterations of mitochondria morphology to favor viral replication, suggesting a viral co-opting of mitochondria functions. Here, we performed an extensive transmission electron microscopy-based quantitative analysis to demonstrate that both DENV and ZIKV alter endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria contacts (ERMC). This correlated at the molecular level with an impairment of ERMC tethering protein complexes located at the surface of both organelles. Furthermore, virus infection, as well as NS4B expression modulated the mitochondrial oxygen consumption rate. Consistently, metabolomic and mitoproteomic analyses revealed a decrease in the abundance of several metabolites of the Krebs cycle and changes in the stoichiometry of the electron transport chain. Most importantly, ERMC destabilization by protein knockdown increased virus replication while dampening ZIKV-induced apoptosis. Overall, our results support the notion that flaviviruses hijack ERMCs to generate a cytoplasmic environment beneficial for sustained and efficient replication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".