MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323828043 · doi:10.4171/owr/2022/1

Graph Theory

2023· article· en· W4323828043 on OpenAlexaff
Jim Geelen, Daniel Král͏̌

Bibliographic record

VenueOberwolfach Reports · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGraph Labeling and Dimension Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGraph theoryConjectureComputer scienceGraphRange (aeronautics)Theoretical computer scienceMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsEngineeringCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Graph theory is a quickly developing area of mathematics, with an increasing number of connections to various parts of mathematics and computer science. The workshop aimed at bringing together a broad range of researchers at various career stages to discuss recent exciting developments, in particular, the Product Structure Theorem and progress towards the resolution of Hadwiger’s Conjecture. While the workshop was impacted by the COVID pandemic, it still offered many interesting talks, which updated its participants on recent developments covering the whole breadth of graph theory, and collaboration opportunities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOberwolfach ReportsSame topicGraph Labeling and Dimension ProblemsFrench-language works237,207