Evolution of interictal activity in models of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interictal activity and seizures are the hallmarks of focal epileptic disorders (which include mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, MTLE) in humans and in animal models. Interictal activity, which is recorded with cortical and intracerebral EEG recordings, comprises spikes, sharp waves and high-frequency oscillations, and has been used in clinical practice to identify the epileptic zone. However, its relation with seizures remains debated. Moreover, it is unclear whether specific EEG changes in interictal activity occur during the time preceding the appearance of spontaneous seizures. This period, which is termed "latent", has been studied in rodent models of MTLE in which spontaneous seizures start to occur following an initial insult (most often a status epilepticus induced by convulsive drugs such as kainic acid or pilocarpine) and may mirror epileptogenesis, i.e., the process leading the brain to develop an enduring predisposition to seizure generation. Here, we will address this topic by reviewing experimental studies performed in MTLE models. Specifically, we will review data highlighting the dynamic changes in interictal spiking activity and high-frequency oscillations occurring during the latent period, and how optogenetic stimulation of specific cell populations can modulate them in the pilocarpine model. These findings indicate that interictal activity: (i) is heterogeneous in its EEG patterns and thus, presumably, in its underlying neuronal mechanisms; and (ii) can pinpoint to the epileptogenic processes occurring in focal epileptic disorders in animal models and, perhaps, in epileptic patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".