MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323834336 · doi:10.2118/208897-pa

Effect of Temperature on Two-Phase Gas/Oil Relative Permeability in Viscous Oil Reservoirs: A Combined Experimental and History-Matching-Based Analysis

2023· article· en· W4323834336 on OpenAlexaff
Saket Kumar, Hemanta Sarma, Brij Maini

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelative permeabilityPetroleum engineeringPermeability (electromagnetism)Fossil fuelEnhanced oil recoveryViscosityDisplacement (psychology)ThermodynamicsMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceMechanicsGeologyChemistryPorosityComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Thermal enhanced oil recovery (TEOR) is the most widely accepted method for exploiting the heavy oil reservoirs in North America. In addition to improving the mobility of oil due to its viscosity reduction, the high temperature down in the hole due to the injection of the vapor phase may significantly alter the fluid flow performance and behavior, as represented by the relative permeability to fluids in the formations. Therefore, in TEOR, the relative permeabilities can change with a change in temperature. Also, there is no model that accounts for the change in temperature on two-phase gas/oil relative permeability. Further, the gas/oil relative permeability and its dependence on temperature are required data for the numerical simulation of TEOR. Very few studies are available on this topic with no emerging consensus on a general behavior of such effects. The scarcity of such studies is mostly due to experimental problems to make reliable measurements. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to overcome the experimental issues and investigate the effect of temperature on gas/oil relative permeability. Oil displacement tests were carried out in a 45-cm-long sandpack at temperatures ranging from 64°C to 210°C using a viscous mineral oil (PAO-100), deionized water, and nitrogen gas. It was found that the unsteady-state method was susceptible to several experimental artifacts in viscous oil systems due to a very adverse mobility ratio. However, despite such experimental artifacts, a careful analysis of the displacement data led to obtaining meaningful two-phase gas/oil relative permeability curves. These curves were used to interpret the relative permeability curves for gas/heavy oil systems using the experimentally obtained displacement results. We noted that at the end of gasflooding, the “final” residual oil saturation (Sor) still eluded us even after several pore volumes (PVs) of gas injection. This rendered the experimentally determined endpoint gas relative permeability (krge) and Sor unreliable. In contrast, the irreducible water saturation (Swir) and the endpoint oil relative permeability (kroe) were experimentally achievable. The complete two-phase gas/heavy oil relative permeability curves are inferred with a newly developed systematic history-matching algorithm in this study. This systematic history-matching technique helped us to determine the uncertain parameters of the oil/gas relative permeability curves, such as the two exponents of the Corey equation (No and Ng), Sor and krge. The history match showed that kroe and Swir were experimentally achievable and were reliably interpreted, except these four parameters (i.e., Corey exponents, true residual oil saturation, and gas endpoint relative permeability) were interpreted from simulations rather than from experiments. Based on our findings, a new correlation has been proposed to model the effect of temperature on two-phase gas/heavy oil relative permeability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Reservoir Evaluation & EngineeringSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207