MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323844304 · doi:10.18280/isi.280119

Papaya Fruit Maturity Estimation Using Wavelet and ConvNET

2023· article· en· W4323844304 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ashoka Kumar Ratha, Nalini Kanta Barpanda, Prabira Kumar Sethy, Santi Kumari Behera

Bibliographic record

VenueIngénierie des systèmes d information · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaturity (psychological)EstimationWaveletHorticultureBiologyArtificial intelligenceMathematicsComputer scienceEngineeringPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The papaya (Carica papaya L.) is a tropical fruit with high commercial value due to its superior nutritional and therapeutic properties.Papayas must be packaged in the fruit industry according to their degree of ripeness.Physically grading papaya fruit using human vision is time-consuming and destructive.A brand-new, non-destructive classification system for papaya fruit development stages is being offered as a result of this study.The project proposes to investigate three classification models: one deep learning method, the DWT approach, and a hybrid approach.A total of 300 papaya fruit sample photos were used in the experiment, 100 of which corresponded to each fruit's three ripeness stages: midripen, ripen, and un-ripen.The maturity level of papaya is estimated using a hybrid network, i.e., the combination of high-level features and an SVM classifier.The high-level features are the integration of deep Features of VGG16 and coefficients of DWT.The accuracy and AUC of the proposed hybrid model are 98% and 100%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIngénierie des systèmes d informationSame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207