The Evolution of Chronic Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma in the Inuit and Oriental Eye
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Primary Angle Closure has a high incidence in both China and amongst Inuit.Genetic Study along with both linguistic medical anthropology and anatomical studies support this connection.An increase in resulting mental health issues is documented.A case study is presented showing the usefulness of Swept Source OCT with clear three-dimensional imaging is useful in diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.Glaucoma is reported as the leading etiology of irreversible blindness, and is most commonly seen in Asian populations.One form of glaucoma in particular, primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) is likely responsible for the high prevalence of glaucoma reported in China, given that over 80% of PACG cases are found in the region [1,2].It is believed that the increased incidence of PACG in this population is secondary to plateau iris, which carries a higher prevalence among Asian populations [3].PACG carries a higher rate of morbidity with irreversible blindness than Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG), and therefore is a significant population health concern in the region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".