MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323849276 · doi:10.1080/02560046.2023.2185272

Thinking While Black: Translating the Politics and Popular Culture of a Rebel Generation <b>Thinking While Black: Translating the Politics and Popular Culture of a Rebel Generation</b> , Daniel McNeil, Toronto, Canada, Between the Lines, 2022, x + 184 pp., $24.95 (paperback), ISBN 978-177-11-3607-5

2023· article· en· W4323849276 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nicholas Rickards

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Arts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsMedia studiesGender studiesSociologyPolitical sciencePopular cultureAestheticsLawArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Academics working in the social sciences will likely agree that although Black critical consciousness has had its meritorious impact on various social theories, pedagogies, and schools of thought, ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.021
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical ArtsSame topicRace, History, and American SocietyFrench-language works237,207