White matter and gray matter changes related to cognition in community populations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Further studies are needed to improve the understanding of the pathological process underlying cognitive impairments. The purpose of this study is to investigate the global and topographic changes of white matter integrity and cortical structure related to cognitive impairments in a community-based population. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was performed based on 995 subjects (aged 56.8 ± 9.1 years, 34.8% males) from the Shunyi study, a community-dwelling cohort. Cognitive status was accessed by a series of neurocognitive tests including Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), category Verbal Fluency Test (VFT), Digit Span Test (DST), and Trail Making Tests A and B (TMT-A and TMT-B). Structural and diffusional MRI data were acquired. White matter integrity was assessed using fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and peak width of skeletonized mean diffusivity (PSMD). Cortical surface area, thickness, and volume were measured using Freesurfer. Probabilistic tractography was further conducted to track the white matter fibers connecting to the cortical regions related to cognition. General linear models were used to investigate the association between brain structure and cognition. Results: < 0.001). Global cortical surface area, thickness, and volume were not related to cognitive scores. In tract-based spatial statistics analysis, disruptive white matter integrity was related to cognition impairment, mainly in visuomotor processing speed, semantic memory, and executive function (TMT-A and VFT), rather than verbal short-term memory and working memory (DST). In the whole brain vertex-wise analysis, surface area in the left orbitofrontal cortex, right posterior-dorsal part of the cingulate gyrus, and left central sulcus were positively associated with MMSE and MoCA scores, and the association were independent of the connecting white matter tract. Conclusion: Disrupted white matter integrity and regional cortical surface area were related to cognition in community-dwelling populations. The associations of cortical surface area and cognition were independent of the connecting white matter tract.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".