A privacy‐preserving method for publishing data with multiple sensitive attributes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The overgeneralisation may happen because most studies on data publishing for multiple sensitive attributes (SAs) have not considered the personalised privacy requirement. Furthermore, sensitive information disclosure may also be caused by these personalised requirements. To address the matter, this article develops a personalised data publishing method for multiple SAs. According to the requirements of individuals, the new method partitions SAs values into two categories: private values and public values, and breaks the association between them for privacy guarantees. For the private values, this paper takes the process of anonymisation, while the public values are released without this process. An algorithm is designed to achieve the privacy mode, where the selectivity is determined by the sensitive value frequency and undesirable objects. The experimental results show that the proposed method can provide more information utility when compared with previous methods. The theoretic analyses and experiments also indicate that the privacy can be guaranteed even though the public values are known to an adversary. The overgeneralisation and privacy breach caused by the personalised requirement can be avoided by the new method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.043 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it