MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323891869 · doi:10.1109/ojia.2023.3254669

Dynamic Phasor Finite-Element Modeling of a DFIG for Grid Connection Studies

2023· article· en· W4323891869 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Industry Applications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhasorFinite element methodComputer scienceRotor (electric)Time domainRotation (mathematics)GridElectric power systemFrequency domainModeling and simulationControl theory (sociology)Power (physics)EngineeringSimulationMechanical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cosimulation studies of electric power systems and electric machines have always been a challenge. In order to reduce the simulation time to a reasonable value, lumped-parameter electric machine models are commonly used in electric power system modeling software packages to avoid the heavy computational burden of more accurate modeling methods especially finite-element method (FEM) on the expense of less accuracy. The proposed technique in this article combines the dynamic phasor modeling technique for power system simulations with the FEM to accurately model the doubly fed induction generator while connected to the grid. The utilization of dynamic phasors enables adopting large simulation time steps resulting in a significant reduction in the simulation time compared to the conventional time-domain FEM modeling. The mathematical foundation of the proposed modeling method is presented including the generator's core saturation. Custom-written C++ codes have been developed by the authors to execute the new dynamic phasor FEM algorithm and the conventional time-domain FEM in order to fairly compare their accuracy and numerical performances. As the proposed method combines time and frequency domains, a unique capability of modeling the rotor movement can be achieved. The rotation can be represented by physically incrementing the rotor and airgap mesh as in regular time-domain solvers, by mathematically representing the rotation using the virtual blocked rotor method as in frequency-domain solvers, and the proposed method of combining the two aforementioned approaches. The three methods of modeling rotor rotation are discussed, and their simulation results are compared to give a guide to choose the proper method for the different modeling targets. The results show that the proposed dynamic phasor FEM is capable of producing comparable results to the traditional time-domain solver at a substantially reduced simulation time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it