MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323911615 · doi:10.55340/e2j.v8i2.1080

READING ANXIETY AND ITS EFFECT TOWARDS READING COMPREHENSION ON GRADE EIGHT STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 1 BAUBAU

2022· article· en· W4323911615 on OpenAlexaff
Sri Wulandari, Faisal Islamy

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish Education Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Media Use
Canadian institutionsBombardier (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReading comprehensionReading (process)PsychologyMathematics educationAnxietyStatistical analysisComprehensionTest (biology)CorrelationAnxiety scoreComputer scienceStatisticsMathematicsLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Problem statement of this research was whether there are any significant correlation of reading anxiety towards reading comprehension on grade eight students of SMP Negeri 1 Baubau. Objective of the research was to find out whether there was the correlation reading anxiety towards reading comprehension on grade eight students of SMP Negeri 1 Baubau. The data collection in this research was carried out using a research instrument in the form of a questionnaire to determine the student’s reading anxiety and a test to determine student’s reading comprehension. The data obtained were analysis by descriptive statistical analysis and inferential statistical analysis. The results of this research showed that the correlation coefficient value of students reading anxiety towards students reading comprehension was 0.037 with a significant level of 0.798. Because the sig.(2-tailled) > 0.05 the hypothesis H0 is accepted and H1 was rejected. It means that there was not any significant and correlation classroom reading anxiety towards reading comprehension on grade eight students of SMP Negeri 1 Baubau.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.662
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish Education JournalSame topicEducational Methods and Media UseFrench-language works237,207