Sim-to-Real Surgical Robot Learning and Autonomous Planning for Internal Tissue Points Manipulation Using Reinforcement Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indirect simultaneous positioning (ISP), where internal tissue points are placed at desired locations indirectly through the manipulation of boundary points, is a type of subtask frequently performed in robotic surgeries. Although challenging due to complex tissue dynamics, automating the task can potentially reduce the workload of surgeons. This letter presents a sim-to-real framework for learning to automate the task without interacting with a real environment, and for planning preoperatively to find the grasping points that minimize local tissue deformation. A control policy is learned using deep reinforcement learning (DRL) in the FEM-based simulation environment and transferred to real-world situation. Grasping points are planned in the simulator by utilizing the trained policy using Bayesian optimization (BO). Inconsistent simulation performance is overcome by formulating the problem as a state augmented Markov decision process (MDP). Experimental results show that the learned policy places the internal tissue points accurately, and that the planned grasping points yield small tissue deformation among the trials. The proposed learning and planning scheme is able to automate internal tissue point manipulation in surgeries and has the potential to be generalized to complex surgical scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it