MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

2D-Material-Based Volatile and Nonvolatile Memristive Devices for Neuromorphic Computing

2023· article· en· W4323923748 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Materials Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNanjing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsNeuromorphic engineeringVon Neumann architectureComputer scienceUnconventional computingBottleneckReservoir computingMemristorArtificial neural networkComputer architectureArtificial intelligenceDistributed computingElectronic engineeringEmbedded systemEngineeringRecurrent neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuromorphic computing can process large amounts of information in parallel and provides a powerful tool to solve the von Neumann bottleneck. Constructing an artificial neural network (ANN) is a common means to realize neuromorphic computing, which has exhibited potential applications in pattern recognition, complex sensing, and other areas. Reservoir computing (RC), which is another approach to realize neuromorphic computing, has shown some progress and attracted researchers’ attention. Neuromorphic computing can be generally implemented by fabricating memristive array systems. 2D-material-based memristive systems and their applications in ANN and RC have been investigated substantially in recent years due to the unique properties of these systems, such as atomic-level thickness and high carrier mobility. In this Review, we first discuss the volatility and nonvolatility properties of memristive devices and their applications in ANN and RC. Second, 2D materials that can be used to fabricate these devices are introduced, and their classification, physical properties, and preparation methods are presented. Third, we discuss the working mechanisms of 2D-material-based synaptic devices, the mimicked synaptic functions, and the applications of these devices in neuromorphic computing through ANN and RC. Lastly, the performance, progress, and future development directions of 2D-material-based synaptic devices are analyzed. This work systematically investigates the status of 2D-material-based synaptic devices and promotes their utilization in neuromorphic computing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.923

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it