Associations between self-reported sleep quality and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sleep disorders are very common in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Several parameters of polysomnography seem to correlate with cognitive scores and amyloid biomarkers in the different stages of AD. However, there is limited evidence for the relationship between self-reported sleep impairment and disease biomarkers. In this study, we assessed the relationship between self-reported sleep complaints, with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and both cognitive function and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in 70 patients with MCI and 78 patients with AD. Sleep duration and daytime dysfunction were higher in AD. Daytime dysfunction had a negative correlation with cognitive scores (Mini-Mental-State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment) and with amyloid-beta1–42 protein, and a positive correlation with total tau protein. However, daytime dysfunction was an independent predictor only of t-tau values (F = 57.162; 95% CI: [18.118; 96.207], P = 0.004). These findings support a relationship between daytime dysfunction, cognitive scores and neurodegeneration, further expanding recent findings that it may signal a risk of dementia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it