Concurrent prediction of RNA secondary structures with pseudoknots and local 3D motifs in an Integer Programming framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Motivation The prediction of RNA structure canonical base pairs from a single sequence, especially pseudoknotted ones, remains challenging in a thermodynamic models that approximates the energy of the local 3D motifs joining canonical stems. It has become more and more apparent in recent years that the structural motifs in the loops, composed of non-canonical interactions, are essential for the final shape of the molecule enabling its multiple functions. Our capacity to predict accurate 3D structures is also limited when it comes to the organization of the large intricate network of interactions that form inside those loops. Results We previously developed the integer programming framework RNAMoIP (RNA Motifs over Integer Programming) to reconcile RNA secondary structure and local 3D motif information available in databases. We further develop our model to now simultaneously predict the canonical base pairs (with pseudoknots) from base pair probability matrices with or without alignment. We benchmarked our new method over the all non-redundant RNAs below 150 nucleotides. We show that the joined prediction of canonical base pairs structure and local conserved motifs (i) improves the ratio of well-predicted interactions in the secondary structure, (ii) predicts well canonical and Wobble pairs at the location where motifs are inserted, (iii) is greatly improved with evolutionary information and (iv) non-canonical motifs at kink-turn locations. Availability The source code of the framework is available at https://gitlab.info.uqam.ca/cbe/RNAMoIP and an interactive web server at https://rnamoip.cbe.uqam.ca/
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".