CUIDADOS DE SAÚDE MENTAL DURANTE A PANDEMIA DO NOVO CORONAVÍRUS: UM RESSURGIMENTO DOS ESTUDOS EM PRÁTICAS CONTEMPLATIVAS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inúmeras variáveis relacionadas à pandemia de covid-19 impactam o bem-estar mental de indivíduos no mundo todo, como incerteza sobre o futuro, preocupação com amigos e familiares, fragilidades econômicas, altos índices de desemprego e a impossibilidade de exercer o luto pela perda de pessoas queridas. As consequências na saúde mental da população tornaram-se um desafio para equipe e líderes, que buscaram alternativas para lidar com a piora do estado mental fragilizado de seus colaboradores. Frente a isso, observou-se na literatura acadêmica e corporativa uma busca por soluções que possam amenizar e/ou melhorar o bem-estar mental, sendo essas, em sua grande maioria, práticas contemplativas milenares.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".