MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323968421 · doi:10.4000/genesis.7539

Martyn Lyons, The Typewriter Century, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, coll. « Studies in Book and Print Culture », 2021. 261 p.

2022· article· fr· W4323968421 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yuri Cerqueira dos Anjos

Bibliographic record

VenueGenesis · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedia studiesPrint cultureArtHistorySociologyArt historyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pendant longtemps, la machine à écrire a été un objet fondamental pour les pratiques et imaginaires de l’écriture. Sur les tables des jeunes filles inaugurant leurs vies professionnelles dans les bureaux modernes vers 1900 ou sous les doigts plus ou moins habiles de plusieurs écrivains célèbres du xxᵉ siècle, la machine à écrire était partout. À cette période unique et souvent négligée de l’histoire de l’écriture Martyn Lyons donne le nom de « typewriter century ». Dans cette étude, Lyons so...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.555
Threshold uncertainty score0.895

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenesisSame topicDigital Humanities and ScholarshipFrench-language works237,207