MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323979807 · doi:10.1353/jer.2023.0014

North of America: Loyalists, Indigenous Nations, and the Borders of the Long American Revolution by Jeffers Lennox

2023· article· en· W4323979807 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark Edward Lender

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Early Republic · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousNationalismEconomic historyLawSociologyHistoryPolitical sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: North of America: Loyalists, Indigenous Nations, and the Borders of the Long American Revolution by Jeffers Lennox Mark Edward Lender (bio) American Revolution, Loyalists, Indigenous, Canada, Nationalism North of America: Loyalists, Indigenous Nations, and the Borders of the Long American Revolution. By Jeffers Lennox. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2022. Pp. 353. Cloth, $35.00.) Jeffers Lennox has given us a fresh, interesting, and in some ways a novel perspective on the shaping of the American revolutionary struggle and the birth of the new republic. North of America makes a multi-faceted argument that comprehending the revolution must take into account the actions and motives of territories and groups who rejected the patriot cause. Specifically, this meant loyalist populations and a range of Indigenous nations to the north of the thirteen rebellious colonies. In concert or acting independently, these groups rallied to hold the Canadian provinces for the Crown and traditional homelands for the tribes. In so doing, they forced the rebels to consider the nature of their revolution and of the independent nation it produced. "To understand the United States and its citizens," Lennox insists, "we must explore how this country and its people were born of a relationship with people and places that refused the revolutionary path" (17). Lennox does this in seven topical chapters and an epilogue (this is not a chronological volume), each chapter dealing with a particular group, region, or issue. In each case he finds patriots, and later American citizens, constantly looking northward at those who rejected the revolution and its aftermath. The author deftly explores how American thinking and self-perceptions as revolutionaries and citizens changed as they confronted and adjusted to Indigenous, loyalist, and British initiatives in what eventually became Canada—the second nation born of the revolution. In "Of [End Page 166] Montreal" (Chapter 1), for example, he offers a fresh look at what the revolutionaries sought to accomplish in their 1775 invasion of Canada. Driving the British from Quebec, patriots hoped, would not only expand the revolution geographically and spread the ideals of the revolt, but also facilitate peaceful relationships with the northern tribes. Military and diplomatic failures in Canada, however, while disappointing for the rebels, offered them a healthy dose of reality. The setbacks taught the revolutionaries not to bite off more than they could chew and to focus on a more realistic goal—achieving independence from the empire for the thirteen colonies. It was a valuable lesson. North of America addresses other learning experiences for the revolution. Lennox skillfully explains how the mostly Protestant patriots tried to square their often-rabid anti-Catholic sentiments with a desire to entice the French-speaking population in Canada and the West into the revolutionary fold—and why the effort ultimately failed. He examines the matter of patriot diplomacy—critical to international acceptance of America as an independent power—and finds that diplomatic relations with the Indigenous nations were every bit as important. That diplomacy with the tribes ultimately failed in many instances—war was often the result—did not gainsay the fact that many Indians were strong enough to defend their homelands and merit serious negotiations. This in turn forced the expansionist Americans to more carefully gauge their movements west and to be realistic about their borders in the Northeast. These and other interactions with the northern Indigenous nations and loyal provinces gradually compelled Americans to assess their identity as a nation. At the same time a nascent Canadian nationalism took hold, and by 1812 it was clear that Canadians and Americans—with considerable shared history and even kinships—had become different peoples. Lennox's writing is worth noting. While he has tackled a subject of considerable breath and complexity, at only 278 pages of text North of America is not an overly large book. Lennox writes concisely and comes to the point; there is no excess verbiage. In fact, this is an easy and often enjoyable read with any number of new observations—all based on a deep research effort and a full command of the pertinent secondary literature. Lennox has made a genuinely significant contribution. This has been a very long way of saying that "I...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.374
Threshold uncertainty score0.842

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Early RepublicSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207