MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4324012014 · doi:10.34010/icomse.v3i2.7499

PERANCANGAN VIDEO PROMOSI PRODUK PUSAT PENELITIAN TEH DAN KINA (PPTK) GAMBUNG

2022· article· id· W4324012014 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndonesian Community Service and Empowerment (IComSE) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fakultas Desain Universitas Komputer Indonesia yang telah bekerjasama dengan Puat Penelitian Teh dan Kina (PPTK) melaksanakan pelayanan kepada masyarakat berupa perancangan/ pembuatan iklan video. Metode pelaksanaan kegiatan pengabdian pada masyarakat ini dilakukan dengan beberapa cara baik bertemu langsung dengan pihak PPTK, maupun diskusi secara online. Adapun metode yang digunakan dalam pembuatan video adalah dengan metode langsung berupa Design Thinking yaitu mitra diajak berperan serta sebagai klien. Video Iklan Produk PPTK Gambung ini telah di upload ke Youtube pada tanggal 9 Februari 2022 dengan dengan judul “Gamboeng White Tea Baik bagi Menjaga Kesehatan dan Kecantikan Wanita” dengan link https://youtu.be/vAcjEw9xeeo. Video yang telah dirancang ini sejalan dengan penelitian tentang white tea yang menyatakan bahwa produk ini perlu didorong untuk komersialisasi dengan melakukan promosi yang tepat sasaran.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0000.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it