Redundant field survey data of cyclotron with imperfect median plane
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract An accurate and detailed field map is important for cyclotron beam dynamics studies. During the long history of cyclotron studies, many techniques have been developed by cyclotron pioneers for the treatment of median plane field map. In this paper, we take the TRIUMF 500 MeV cyclotron as an example to study the asymmetric field resulting from imperfect median plane symmetry. The “Gordon approach” and a highly accurate compact finite differentiation method are used to investigate the historical field survey data. The redundancy in the survey data is revealed by the expansion method, which also makes it possible to correct the error in the measurement. Finally, both the azimuthal field B θ and the axial gradient of the axial field dB z / dz in the median plane are corrected using the radial field map B r . The influence of the correction is examined by recalculating the equilibrium orbit properties of the TRIUMF cyclotron. The result shows significantly increased vertical centering errors of the closed orbits. A further simulation study suggests that these centering errors can be reduced to below 1.5 cm by adjusting the trim coils' B r field within the output limits of our trim coils' power supplies. The error in the measurement field data may explain why the calculated trim coils' settings during the cyclotron commissioning in 1974 encountered difficulty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it