A multimodal hybrid stochastic-based deterministic ARFIMA model for the sustainable analysis of COVID-19 pandemic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The revise abstract is given as follows: The rapid emergence of the super-spreader COVID-19 with severe economic calamities with devastating social impact worldwide created the demand for effective research on the spread dynamics of the disease to combat and create surveillance systems on a global scale. In this study, a novel hybrid Deterministic Autoregressive Fractional Integral Moving Average (ARFIMA) model is presented to forecast the bimodal COVID-19 transmission dynamics. The heterogeneity of multimodal behavior of the COVID-19 pandemic in Pakistan is modeled by a hybrid paradigm, in which a deterministic pattern is combined with the ARFIMA model to absorb the inherent chaotic pattern of the pandemic spread. The fractional fluctuation of the real epidemic system is effectively taken as a paradigm by stochastic type improved the deterministic model and ARFIMA process. Special transformations are also introduced to enhance the convergent rate of the bimodal paradigm in deterministic modeling. The outcome of the improved deterministic model is combined with the ARFIMA model is evaluated on the spread pattern of pandemic data in Pakistan for the next 30 days. The performance-indices of the hybrid-model based on Relative-Errors and RMSE statistics confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed paradigm for long-term epidemic modeling compared to other classical and machine learning algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".