Two Such Different Worlds: Edward J. Hedican and Catherine Anne Wilson on Family and Community in Rural Ontario in the Victorian era
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two recent volumes from Canada's leading scholarly presses represent the possible futures of rural history as practiced in Canada: Edward J. Hedican, After the Famine.The Irish Family Farm in Eastern Ontario, 1851-1881 and Catherine Anne Wilson, Being Neighbours.Cooperative Work and Rural Culture, 1830-1960.Each has implications both direct and indirect for the way that the field of family history deals with central Canadian culture as it moved swiftly from being virtually a contact culture to a fully articulated and dominant capitalistic European society.Yet, when placed side by side, the most recent works of these two scholars could almost come from different planets.The authors have a good deal in common and this needs to be pointed out.A brief discussion on their commonalities is useful, for it forms a plinth that makes it easier to see the dimensions of their divergence.Each author has previously done significant historical work.E. J. Hedican, a historical ethnographer with a special interest in the Canadian north, published The Ogoki River Guides: Emergent Leadership among the Northern Ojibwa (Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1986), a monograph on Ogoki River Guides among the Ojibwa and an expansion and revision of his 1978 McGill University doctoral thesis.He subsequently wrote three books of memoir and of methodological reflection.C. A. Wilson, previous to her present volume, published two works that relate to the usually ignored practice of tenancy as one of the tactics adopted in the early stages of New World settlement.Wilson's Tenants in Time: Family Strategies, Land, and Liberalism in Upper Canada, 1799-1871 (McGill-Queen's University Press, 2009) is a historiographical depth charge.It is a strong argument for recognizing that the alleged North-American pattern of quick acquisition of freehold farms in the settlement period was not universal; indeed, it may not even have been predominant.This argument is still not fully assimilated into the social and economic history of the United States and Canada in the nineteenth century.Its publication placed Wilson among the leaders of the new rural history of the twenty-first century.Both authors have personal interests in their subject-in the best sense.Hedican focuses his study on Admaston Township in Renfrew County, Ontario in the third quarter of the nineteenth century.He is understandably possessive of "my own family of Irish immigrants, that of Catherine and Edward Hedican of Admaston Township; there were thirteen children " (p.192).Hedican reports that his
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.031 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".