Bibliographic record
Abstract
Demonstrated by the research and study, few sources were the main reason to avoid a lot of researchers to study that city (Guadalajara), also known in the vagina in the Arabs, has opened the commander (Tariq ibn Ziyad) in (92 AH / 710 AD) after opening the city of Toledo, the capital of Goths, has made no effort to go out and make that information scattered in the wombs of these sources in search of an independent guarantee the definition in Guadalajara, and the role of scientists such as the poet Abu Hatem Ahadjara and updated Ahmed bin Saeed Al Masada and of Abdullah Ibrahim Al-Canadian author of the book Almeshb in News the people of Morocco, and writer of Abdul Malik ibn Khushani branch, and others who contributed to the building that civilization. The case of Al-Andalus by the Muslim Arab conquest can not be compared because they had reached after the Islamic conquest of the progress and prosperity. The civilization of Andalusia was Arab-Islamic, derived origins of civilization in the Arab Mashreq, which not only transport but also adopted the innovation, creativity and overall appearance to the back of all aspects of life, even living in Andalusia became the Doha saturated cultural spirit of science and literature. It was the princes of the Arabs a major role in supporting and opinions of the scientific movement, Vqrbua scientists and respect them in various areas of life science, especially science Koran and biography of the Prophet and Arabic language and literature, and their efforts in obtaining the most valuable and most precious books and Nuadrha which was issued in Baghdad and other urban centers, but was Many of the princes and kings in the forefront of Arab writers and scholars Kalmatmd Ibn Abbad's Seville, and this research confirms that the city of Guadalajara is part of the civilization of Andalusia .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.049 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".