Design of Maximum Directivity Beamformers With Linear Acoustic Vector Sensor Arrays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies the design of maximum directivity factor (MDF) beamformers based on uniform linear arrays (ULAs) consisting of acoustic vector sensors (AVSs). We first derive the main lobe constraints, which ensure that the beamformer's beampattern achieves a maximum in the look direction, and prove that any beamformer that satisfies the proposed constraints can be written as the sum of two orthogonal beamformers: the maximum white noise gain (MWNG) beamformer and a reduced-rank beamformer. Then, we derive the MDF beamformer by maximizing the directivity factor (DF) under the deduced constraints. We also derive a robust version of the MDF beamformer, which can keep the WNG above a pre-specified level. Compared to the conventional MDF beamformer based on ULAs with omnidirectional microphones, the designed MDF beamformer with uniform linear AVS arrays (ULAVSAs) can steer the beampattern to any look direction in the 3-dimensional space and achieves a higher directivity. The proposed MDF beamformer also outperforms the two-step MDF beamformer with ULAVSAs since it maximizes the DF. The proposed methods are validated through simulations as well as real experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".