MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4324116825 · doi:10.1016/j.gimo.2023.100005

O04: Developing a framework for sequence variant interpretation for multiple X-linked inborn errors of metabolism: The ClinGen IEM Working Group Experience

2023· article· en· W4324116825 on OpenAlexaff
Emily Groopman, Amanda Thomas‐Wilson, Shruthi Mohan, Jennifer Goldstein, Meredith Weaver, Raquel Fernandez, Heidi Wallis, Ljuba Caldovic, Nicholas Ah Mew, Irene De Biase, Ann B. Moser, Sharon F. Suchy, Tatiana Yuzyuk, Sarah Young, Saadet Mercimek‐Andrews, Nancy Braverman, Rong Mao

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetics in Medicine Open · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill Genome CentreUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSequence (biology)Interpretation (philosophy)Group (periodic table)Computational biologyInborn error of metabolismGeneticsComputer scienceBioinformaticsChemistryBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.136

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0060.007
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueGenetics in Medicine OpenSame topicMetabolism and Genetic DisordersFrench-language works237,207