MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A model-free block-based camera calibration method

2022· article· en· W4324119503 on OpenAlexaff
Guifang Shao, Qiao Sun, Jincai Luo, Tun-Dong Liu, Yubin Wei, Jianqi Ma

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceBlock (permutation group theory)Distortion (music)Camera resectioningCalibrationCamera auto-calibrationFeature (linguistics)Perspective (graphical)Transformation (genetics)Monte Carlo methodImage (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Camera calibration is crucial for machine vision application. To deal with the limitation of complex distortion modeling and requirement of multiple images at different viewpoints, this paper put forward a model-free block-based camera calibration method. The Monte Carlo simulation is first introduced to reduce the affection of ununiform illumination. Then, to precisely estimate the distortion degree at different image positions, the corner is detected and grouped according to the feature of chessboard plate. Finally, the block-based perspective transformation is utilized to reduce the imaging error aroused by camera manufacturing and installation. Experiments prove that the proposed method is stable and performs better than Zhang’s method at different situations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical measurement and interference techniquesFrench-language works237,207