MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4324122516 · doi:10.23977/acss.2023.070203

Lightweight Steel Bar Detection Network Based on YOLOv5

2023· article· en· W4324122516 on OpenAlex
Ren Junsong, Yi Wang, Peng Xutao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Computer Signals and Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyramid (geometry)Feature (linguistics)Bar (unit)Volume (thermodynamics)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceFunction (biology)Set (abstract data type)Image (mathematics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Data setComputer visionLayer (electronics)MathematicsMaterials scienceGeologyGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proposed YOLOv5 model for steel bar detection has been improved with the addition of an ECA-Net attention module and Ghost Conv to reduce model volume. The Neck layer's feature pyramid module has been replaced with a weighted two-way feature pyramid network structure for better feature fusion. Additionally, the loss function and image processing have been improved for better detection efficiency. The experimental results on the reinforced data set show that the volume of the improved YOLO -EB model is reduced by 11 % compared with the original version, and the mAP is increased by 1.6 %, which meets the requirements of actual use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it