Le Conseil supérieur de l’éducation et les enjeux de scolarisation selon le genre au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Conseil supérieur de l’éducation au Québec est comme un témoin et un interprète de l’évolution des enjeux de scolarisation selon le genre, analysés ici dans un corpus de 17 de ses publications. Le Conseil s’est d’abord montré prudent durant les années 1960 sur les façons de différencier ou non les parcours scolaires des filles et des garçons. La décennie suivante, il a amorcé un virage égalitaire sous l’influence des mouvements féministes. Ses recommandations incitaient les filles et les femmes à améliorer leur statut socioprofessionnel et les établissements à les soutenir. À compter des années 1990, il s’est préoccupé des difficultés observées dans la scolarisation masculine. Pour nuancer des lectures susceptibles de remettre en question l’égalité en progression, il a cherché à mieux cibler les groupes en difficultés tout en maintenant ses perspectives égalitaires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".