MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4324134889 · doi:10.1016/j.aohep.2023.100902

Hepatocellular carcinoma in Colombia 2017 – 2021

2023· letter· en· W4324134889 on OpenAlexaff
Andrés Gómez-Aldana, Diego Rosselli

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Hepatology · 2023
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHepatocellular carcinomaCarcinomaMEDLINEGeneral surgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Después de revisar el artículo de Farah et al . sobre la prevalencia del carcinoma hepatocelular (CHC) en América Latina [1] , creemos que la experiencia colombiana se puede complementar con registros de atención de pacientes individuales recopilados por SISPRO, la base de datos administrativa oficial del Ministerio de Salud [2] . Durante el quinquenio 2017-2021 se reportaron a nivel nacional 2,244 casos de CHC en pacientes adultos; a diferencia de lo informado por Farah et al ., las mujeres representaron el 49% (n=1.099), cifra superior al 39%. La edad media fue de 68 años, similar a la que describen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of HepatologySame topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207