Multilingual Sentiment Analysis using Deep-Learning Architectures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Machine learning techniques such as NLP (Natural language processing) play a key role in a context where mining social media data could add great value to governments of the world countries. The posts and tweets shared by the people on social media can be mined to infer the valuable ‘mindset’ of the people which is much required for any ruling government in the world. The objective of this study is to conduct sentiment analysis to mine the sentiment of the people regarding the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, using machine learning techniques. The idea is to analyze and infer if the countries have reacted in some way, considering the sentiment of their citizens, in the context of economic effects. The pipeline of the implementation associated starts with the data collection from social media such as Twitter and Reddit using Snscraper and the PRAW (Python Reddit API Wrapper). The larger posts from Reddit are handled by implementing suitable text summarization techniques. Sentiment analysis is performed for the social media data using the BERT transformer model. The non-English posts are translated to English using neural machine translation. Also, sentiment analysis is performed at various granularities such as the location and the people that are tagged using Named Entity Recognition techniques. Finally, a comparative analysis of the world countries’ sentiment and their corresponding reliance on Russian oil is performed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".