MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4324137768 · doi:10.1136/oem-2023-epicoh.25

O-144 Incidence of opioid-related harms by occupation in Ontario, Canada: findings from the occupational disease surveillance system

2023· article· en· W4324137768 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkOccupational Cancer Research CentreInstitute for Work & HealthPublic Health Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOccupational safety and healthHazard ratioCohortEnvironmental healthProportional hazards modelDemographyEmergency departmentConfidence intervalPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> The opioid crisis continues unabated in Canada, yet current health surveillance systems that monitor opioid-related harms have limited or no employment information. The limited opioid overdose fatality data available suggest certain occupational groups have been disproportionately affected among those with known employment, namely those in construction and trades occupations, but little is known beyond these data. The Occupational Disease Surveillance System (ODSS), designed to detect work-related disease in a large cohort of workers in Ontario (Canada), was recently expanded to identify opioid-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits. We sought to estimate associations between occupation and risk of opioid-related harms in the Ontario, Canada workforce. <h3>Materials and Methods</h3> The ODSS was established through linkage of Workplace Safety and Insurance Board accepted workers’ compensation lost-time claims data to hospitalization and emergency department data. Workers aged 18–65 were followed from 2006 to 2020 to identify incident opioid-related poisonings (p) and mental and behavioural disorders (mb). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each of the opioid-related harms by occupation, adjusted for sex, age, and birth year. <h3>Results</h3> We identified 10,066 poisoning cases and 11,762 mental and behavioural disorder cases during follow-up among 1.7 million workers. Preliminary findings demonstrate consistent elevated risks for occupations in construction and trades (p: HR=1.57, 95% CI=1.48–1.67, mb: HR=1.59, 95% CI=1.51–1.68), forestry and logging (p: HR=1.45, 95% CI=1.09–1.94, mb: HR=1.70, 95% CI=1.34–2.16), materials handling and related (p: HR=1.32, 95% CI=1.22–1.43, mb: HR=1.22, 95% CI=1.13–1.31), processing (mineral, metal, chemical) (p: HR=1.27, 95% CI=1.14–1.42, mb: HR=1.26, 95% CI=1.14–1.39), among other occupations. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Results suggest opioid-related harms cluster among certain occupational groups in the Ontario workforce, some of which are consistent with fatality data. Identification of high-risk subgroups by occupation will help inform targeted prevention and harm reduction activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it