MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4324138010 · doi:10.5194/acp-2023-3-rc1

Comment on acp-2023-3

2023· peer-review· en· W4324138010 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Qindan Zhu, Bryan Place, Eva Y. Pfannerstill, Tong Sha, Huanxin Zhang, Jun Wang, Clara M. Nussbaumer, P. J. Wooldridge, Benjamin C. Schulze, Caleb Arata, Anthony Bucholtz, John H. Seinfeld, Allen H. Goldstein, R. C. Cohen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle emissions and performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungCalifornia Air Resources Board
KeywordsSan JoaquinEddy covarianceEmission inventoryAir quality indexAir pollutionEnvironmental scienceFlux (metallurgy)OzoneAtmospheric sciencesSoil waterNitrogen oxidesMeteorologyChemistryPhysicsEcosystemSoil scienceWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<strong class="journal-contentHeaderColor">Abstract.</strong> Nitrogen oxides (NO<sub>x</sub>) are principle components of air pollution and serve as important ozone precursors. As the San Joaquin Valley (SJV) experiences some of the worst air quality in the United States, reducing NO<sub>x</sub> emissions is a pressing need, yet quantifying current emissions is complicated due to a mixture of mobile and agriculture sources. We performed airborne eddy covariance flux measurements during the Re-Evaluating the Chemistry of Air Pollutants in CAlifornia (RECAP-CA) field campaign in June 2021. Combining footprint calculations and land cover statistics, we disaggregate the observed fluxes into component fluxes characterized by three different land cover types. On average we find emissions of 2.95 mg m<sup>-2</sup> h<sup>-1</sup> over highways, 1.24 mg m<sup>-2</sup> h<sup>-1</sup> over urban areas and 0.79 mg m<sup>-2</sup> h<sup>-1</sup> over croplands. The calculated NO<sub>x</sub> emissions using flux observations are utilized to evaluate anthropogenic emission inventories and soil NO<sub>x</sub> emission schemes. We show that two anthropogenic inventories for mobile sources, EMFAC (EMssion FACtor) and FIVE (Fuel-based Inventory for Vehicle Emissions), yield similar agreement with emissions derived from measured fluxes over urban regions with 24 % and 22 % low bias, respectively. Three soil NO<sub>x</sub> schemes, including MEGAN v3 (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), BEIS v3.14 (Biogenic Emission Inventory System) and BDISNP (Berkeley Dalhousie Iowa Soil NO Parameterization), show substantial underestimates over the study domain. Compared to the cultivated soil NO<sub>x</sub> emissions derived from measured fluxes, MEGAN and BEIS are lower by more than one order of magnitude and BDISNP is lower by a factor of 2.7. Despite the low bias, observed soil NO<sub>x</sub> emissions and BDISNP present a similar spatial pattern as well as temperature dependence. We conclude that soil NO<sub>x</sub> is a key feature of the NO<sub>x</sub> emissions in the SJV and that a state-of-the-science model of these emissions is needed to simulate emissions for modeling air quality in the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVehicle emissions and performanceFrench-language works237,207