Abstract P405: Low Social Support Mediates the Effect of Marital Stress on 12-month Cardiac-Specific Quality of Life in Young Adults With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Marital stress is associated with worse cardiac outcomes in young adults (≤55 years) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but whether psychosocial factors mediate this association remains largely unknown. We conducted a mediation analysis to investigate whether marital stress worsened quality of life (QoL) after AMI by increasing the likelihood of depression or low social support. Methods: There were 1,037 married/partnered AMI survivors aged 18-55 years enrolled in the VIRGO (Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients) study (2008-2012) (67% women, mean age 47 years). Marital stress was measured by the Stockholm Marital Stress Scale at 1 month post-AMI; categorized as absent/moderate or severe. Depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score ≥10), low social support (ENRICHD Social Support Instrument score ≤3 on ≥2 items and total score ≤18), and cardiac-specific QoL (Seattle Angina Questionnaire) were assessed at 1 year post-AMI. Natural direct and indirect effects of marital stress, depression, and low social support on QoL were estimated by causal mediation analysis with bias-corrected bootstrapped confidence intervals. Baseline QoL, sex, age, race, and socioeconomic factors (education, income, employment, and insurance status) were entered as covariates in all models. Results: There was a statistically significant direct effect from severe marital stress to lower 1-year cardiac-specific QoL after adjusting for covariates ( Figure ). Low social support and depression mediated 14.7% and 11.1% of the total relationship between marital stress and QoL, respectively; however, only the mediating effect through low social support was statistically significant. Conclusion: Marital stress was significantly associated with worse 1-year cardiac-specific QoL, and this effect was partially mediated by low social support. Interventions to decrease marital stress that also screen and provide resources for social support may help to improve AMI outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".