MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4324140234 · doi:10.1161/circ.147.suppl_1.p230

Abstract P230: Left Ventricular Structure and Function Over 25 Years of Occupational Physical Activity Exposure in Cardia

2023· article· en· W4324140234 on OpenAlexaff
Tyler D. Quinn, Abbi D. Lane‐Cordova, Kelley Pettee Gabriel, Barbara Sternfeld, David R. Jacobs, Peter Smith, Bethany Barone Gibbs

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Work & Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEjection fractionCardiologyInternal medicineStroke volumeHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) is known to promote cardiovascular health, while occupational physical activity (OPA) may have paradoxically negative impacts. One proposed, though untested, explanation for the paradoxical associations may be unfavorable vascular remodeling from OPA-induced chronic cardiovascular strain. Hypothesis: High amounts of OPA over 25 years from young adulthood to midlife is associated with adverse left ventricular (LV) structure and function. Methods: Data are from 1,893 participants (48.9% female, 57.3% White, aged 30.4±3.4 years at baseline [the Year 5 exam]) from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study who reported working full time at baseline and two years later. LV structure and function was measured as LV mass, end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), ejection fraction (EF), stroke volume (SV), and e/a-wave ratio (EA) via M-mode and 2-dimensional echocardiograms at baseline and 25-years later. OPA was reported at seven exams during the study period as months/year where the participant performed “vigorous job activities such as lifting, carrying, or digging” for ≥5 hours/week. The 25-year OPA patterns were categorized into three trajectories: zero OPA (0 months/year; n=995), medium OPA (~2-3 months/year; n=526), and high OPA (~6-8 months/year; n=372). Linear regression estimated longitudinal associations between the OPA trajectories and the echocardiogram variables at final follow-up after adjusting for baseline values. Case-wise deletion was used for each model where only those with valid outcome data were included (n=623-1,475). Results: EF and EA were significantly lower in high versus zero OPA. No other statistically significant associations were observed. (Figure 1) Conclusions: In this sample, OPA’s paradoxical impact on cardiovascular health was partially supported by null or adverse associations between high OPA and LV structure and function. Confirmation is needed using more precise OPA measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207