MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4324140593 · doi:10.1161/circ.147.suppl_1.p594

Abstract P594: High-Density Lipoprotein Particle Concentrations and Long-Term Atherosclerotic Disease Risk in Young Adults

2023· article· en· W4324140593 on OpenAlexaff
John T. Wilkins, Waleed Alruwaili, Hongyan Ning, Konrad Teodor Sawicki, Allan D. Sniderman, James D. Otvos, David R. Jacobs, Venkatesh L. Murthy, Ravi V. Shah, Anand Rohatgi, Norrina B. Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineAtherosclerotic cardiovascular diseaseProportional hazards modelCohortSubgroup analysisCholesterolHigh-density lipoproteinDemographyCardiologyEndocrinologyDiseaseConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: HDL particles vary in size and concentration. Indices of overall HDL particle concentration (HDL-P) and the concentrations of different HDL size subspecies (small: H1-H3, medium: H4, H5, and large: H6, H7) have differential associations with near-term CVD events in middle-aged adults. It is unclear if measures of HDL particle concentration predict long-term ASCVD risk in young adults. Methods: Among CARDIA participants (ppts), NMR was used to measure HDL-P and HDL particle size subgroup H1-H7 concentrations. HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) was measured using standard assays. We stratified the ppts into 2 age windows: 20-30y (n= 1645) and 30-40y (n=2922). We used adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to assess the associations between a 1SD higher HDL-C, HDL-P, and HDL1-7 subgroups with incident ASCVD events. We added HDL-P, HDL H1-H7, and HDL-C separately to a modified Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE) model; model performance (discrimination and reclassification) was evaluated. Results: 81 and 163 ASCVD events occurred over (median (IQR)) 31.8y (31.1-32.0y) for the 20-30y age window and over 26.8y (19.1-27.1y) for the 30-40y age window, respectively. In ppts age 20-30y, a higher HDL-P and HDL-C were not associated with ASCVD events, however a higher HDL H6 subgroup level was associated with lower risk for ASCVD in demographic adjusted models. In the age 30-40y group, higher HDL-P, HDL-C, and H6 subgroup were significantly associated with lower ASCVD risks in all models. There were no significant differences in c-statistics across PCE models. However, there were improvements in reclassification for all HDL measures when added to the PCE model in the 20-30y age window, and significant improvements in reclassification when HDL H1-7 were added to the PCE for the 30-40y age window. Conclusion: At younger ages (<40y) differences in HDL particle abundance, in particular large particles, may help reclassify long-term risk for ASCVD in some.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors→French-language works237,207→