Lazy Load Scheduling for Mixed-criticality Applications in Heterogeneous MPSoCs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Newly emerging multiprocessor system-on-a-chip (MPSoC) platforms provide hard processing cores with programmable logic (PL) for high-performance computing applications. In this article, we take a deep look into these commercially available heterogeneous platforms and show how to design mixed-criticality applications such that different processing components can be isolated to avoid contention on the shared resources such as last-level cache and main memory. Our approach involves software/hardware co-design to achieve isolation between the different criticality domains. At the hardware level, we use a scratchpad memory (SPM) with dedicated interfaces inside the PL to avoid conflicts in the main memory. At the software level, we employ a hypervisor to support cache-coloring such that conflicts at the shared L2 cache can be avoided. In order to move the tasks in/out of the SPM memory, we rely on a DMA engine and propose a new CPU-DMA co-scheduling policy, called Lazy Load , for which we also derive the response time analysis. The results of a case study on image processing demonstrate that the contention on the shared memory subsystem can be avoided when running with our proposed architecture. Moreover, comprehensive schedulability evaluations show that the newly proposed Lazy Load policy outperforms the existing CPU-DMA scheduling approaches and is effective in mitigating the main memory interference in our proposed architecture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".