MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4324142616 · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-31042-8

Polarity and mixed-mode oscillations may underlie different patterns of cellular migration

2023· article· en· W4324142616 on OpenAlexafffund
Lucie Plazen, Jalal Al Rahbani, Claire M. Brown, Anmar Khadra

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpaceflight effects on biology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsPolarity (international relations)NeuroscienceMode (computer interface)Mixed modeBiologyComputer scienceCellMaterials scienceGeneticsHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In mesenchymal cell motility, several migration patterns have been observed, including directional, exploratory and stationary. Two key members of the Rho-family of GTPases, Rac and Rho, along with an adaptor protein called paxillin, have been particularly implicated in the formation of such migration patterns and in regulating adhesion dynamics. Together, they form a key regulatory network that involves the mutual inhibition exerted by Rac and Rho on each other and the promotion of Rac activation by phosphorylated paxillin. Although this interaction is sufficient in generating wave-pinning that underscores cellular polarization comprised of cellular front (high active Rac) and back (high active Rho), it remains unclear how they interact collectively to induce other modes of migration detected in Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO-K1) cells. We previously developed a six-variable (6V) reaction-diffusion model describing the interactions of these three proteins (in their active/phosphorylated and inactive/unphosphorylated forms) along with other auxiliary proteins, to decipher their role in generating wave-pinning. In this study, we explored, through computational modeling and image analysis, how differences in timescales within this molecular network can potentially produce the migration patterns in CHO-K1 cells and how switching between migration modes could occur. To do so, the 6V model was reduced to an excitable 4V spatiotemporal model possessing three different timescales. The model produced not only wave-pinning in the presence of diffusion, but also mixed-mode oscillations (MMOs) and relaxation oscillations (ROs). Implementing the model using the Cellular Potts Model (CPM) produced outcomes in which protrusions in the cell membrane changed Rac-Rho localization, resulting in membrane oscillations and fast directionality variations similar to those observed experimentally in CHO-K1 cells. The latter was assessed by comparing the migration patterns of experimental with CPM cells using four metrics: instantaneous cell speed, exponent of mean-square displacement ([Formula: see text]-value), directionality ratio and protrusion rate. Variations in migration patterns induced by mutating paxillin's serine 273 residue were also captured by the model and detected by a machine classifier, revealing that this mutation alters the dynamics of the system from MMOs to ROs or nonoscillatory behaviour through variation in the scaled concentration of an active form of an adhesion protein called p21-Activated Kinase 1 (PAK). These results thus suggest that MMOs and adhesion dynamics are the key mechanisms regulating CHO-K1 cell motility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicSpaceflight effects on biologyFrench-language works237,207