MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4324144759 · doi:10.31192/np.21.1.7

The Failures of Odysseus’ Heroic Leadership

2023· article· en· W4324144759 on OpenAlex
Randy L. Richards, Borna Jalšenjak

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNova prisutnost · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLeadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Canadian institutionsAmbrose University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConfusionCharismaFocus (optics)LeadershipMythologyPsychologyQuality (philosophy)Transactional leadershipPublic relationsServant leadershipLeadership stylePolitical scienceSocial psychologyManagementSociologyEpistemologyLawPsychoanalysisPhilosophyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the paper, the authors offer preliminary insights about leadership and the reasons why looking at the Odysseus myth might not be a good idea. The focus of the paper is on the distinction between heroic behaviors and leadership behaviors and how misalignment between the two undermines the organizational mission (Nostoi). Quality of leadership is still today judged by focusing on the leader’s behavior rather than the success of the mission and the effect on their followers. This leads to various possibly wrong ends such as confusion about the importance of charisma, erosion of trust, and minimizing the importance of the overall mission compared to the personal goals of leaders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.313
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.073 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it