Transmission of stimulus-induced epigenetic changes through cell division is coupled to continuous transcription factor activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trained immunity, or innate immune memory, has been attributed to the long-term retention of stimulus-induced histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) following clearance of the initial stimulus. Yet, it remains unknown how this epigenetic memory can persist for months in dividing cells given the lack of any known mechanism for stimulus-induced histone PTMs to be directly copied from parent to daughter strand during DNA replication. Here, using time course RNA-seq, ChIP-seq, and infection assays, we find that trained macrophages are transcriptionally, epigenetically, and functionally re-programmed for at least 14 cell divisions after stimulus washout. However, the epigenetic changes observed after multiple rounds of cell division do not result from the self-sustained propagation of stimulus-induced epigenetic changes through cell division. Instead, long-lasting epigenetic differences between trained and non-trained cells are always coupled with changes in transcription factor (TF) activity, emphasizing the central role played by TFs, and gene expression changes more broadly, in driving the transmission of stimulus-induced epigenetic changes across cell divisions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".