Resource allocation and user assignment schemes in cellular supported industrial IoT networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) deployment underlying cellular networks has been drawing increasing attention in recent years. In this work, we consider group based resource allocation for industrial IoT networks where cellular‐IoT (C‐IoT) devices support uplink transmission for multiple IoT groups/clusters. The joint group and subcarrier optimization problem is formulated for maximizing the cell/group throughput under the optimal group member selection, subcarrier and minimum data rate constraints. Depending on the interference information, the interference aware group allocation (IA‐GA) is proposed to find the cellular user and cellular‐IoT device grouping for each subcarrier. However, to achieve the maximizing the cell/group throughput, another iterative algorithm, namely genetic algorithm based group allocation (GA‐GA) method is proposed, which provides an optimal solution for the user grouping in the most of the cases where an iterative technique is used for the sub‐carrier allocation. Simulations results show that the proposed IA‐GA and GA‐GA methods provide enhanced cell throughput gain and accessibility of the C‐IoTs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it