MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4324283697 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06440-1_10

Bringing It All Together

2023· book-chapter· en· W4324283697 on OpenAlexaff
Binod Sundararajan, Oksana Shkurska, Shannon Lin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this chapter, we summarize all the concepts from previous chapters. However, more than just being a summary, this chapter will aim to provide key takeaways to students and faculty members about the best ways to really see the benefits of having an engaged, diverse workforce. We will provide a series of simple-to-follow tips and tricks, specific active listening techniques, and methods to develop an open mindset that will allow students to apply them immediately. These will again be provided in the context of scenarios and easy-to-remember examples and hopefully stay with them as they prepare to navigate their workplaces, either as interns or full-time employees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNonprofit Sector and VolunteeringFrench-language works237,207